Wednesday, October 13, 2010

The Understated Trait of Successful Chicago Sports Coaches

I know this isn't aligned with what I typically talk about, but as a Chicago sports fan, during the search for the Cubs managerial opening, I have to draw the line on the candidates they're interviewing.

In today's Chicago Tribune, the four finalists for the open Cubs position appear to be Mike Quade, Ryne Sandberg, Eric Wedge and potentially Joe Girardi.  There's something fundamental and understated that each of these candidates is missing, based on Chicago sports history (or at least the last 35 years). 

When looking back at Chicago championship teams over that period, it's the mustache that has presided.  Yes, the mustache!


Mike Ditka: Classic & bold...looked like a caterpillar who overdosed on "five hour energy" drinks when Ditka would beat a piece of gum like it owed him money



Phil Jackson: The tall, gangly zen-master realized the importance of his mustache as he started his reign. Does that guy know everything?

Ozzie Guillen: As a player, possessed a classic pencil mustache. Has since rounded it out into a well manicured goatee.

Joel Quenneville: Burly, hockey mustache...obviously did his homework on Chicago championship history.
The Bulls have hired a practically hairless guy in Thibodeau. The Bears Lovie Smith couldn't grow a mustache with a tank full of hair tonic.  The Bulls & Bears have written their own ticket...no championships as long as their current coaching staff is in place...

The Cubs must look away from Quade, who was bald at the age of 11 (yes, I'm not making that up!).  None of the candidates possess a mustache...however, there is a perfectly capable guy in the booth who should be heavily pursuaded to change his mind.  Where's this picture from???
Oh, yeah...it's Bob Brenly from the year he won the World Series with the Arizona Diamonbacks.  Looks like a mustache got them over the hump, too. 
Cubs fans...reject the hairless...if we're going to end the curse, the mustache is obviously the key ingredient.

How the Fear of Inaction Drives Top Software Companies' Growth

I do a lot of work for software companies, which is the primary area of my background. I’m now working for a smaller software company, and realized a connection to how these small software companies create action in their prospect base and eventually experience explosive growth.

They sell to the fear of inaction in their prospect base.

If you go to Hoovers.com, which is a company database service that serves as a key pre-calling planning tool for researching your targets, you’ll find almost 3,000 companies in the United States whose primary industry is Computer Software. Every one of these companies will claim to have a strong value proposition – otherwise they wouldn’t be in business.

Now, think about some of the big software companies in the world – companies like SAP & Oracle, who have experienced explosive growth. Take a look at a company like Hyperion who was acquired by Oracle for $3.3B. They have strong value propositions, right? However, what was it that made them what they are today? Was it that SAP’s marketers and sales professionals focused on how they could automate and integrate back office functions? Was it that Hyperion’s marketers focused on how they could tackle the vexing problem of information availability throughout the organization? In some ways, the answer is “yes”, but the reason these companies have the value they do is because they found the fear of inaction in their prospect base, and focused on that.

SAP really took off in the late 90’s, where it was like selling at a drive-thru window (Companies basically came to the window, told them they needed their technology now, and handed over millions of dollars). It wasn’t because these companies wanted to enter sales order information only once, and have that data flow seamlessly to finance, manufacturing, distribution and human resources. It was because SAP found the fear of inaction in their prospect base – Y2K (the result of a practice in early computer program design that caused some date-related processing to operate incorrectly for dates and times on and after January 1, 2000, scaring the world to believe that the world would end, planes would fall out of the sky and cats & dogs would live together in harmony because systems would think that January 1, 2000 was actually January 1, 1900).

Hyperion had a value of $3.3B not only because of how they help organizations do their financial consolidations better – it was because they found the fear of inaction in their prospect base – Sarbanes-Oxley (a United States federal law passed in response to a number of major corporate and accounting scandals including those affecting Enron, Tyco International, Peregrine Systems and WorldCom, thus creating a scare within publicly held companies that has them believing their executives would live the rest of their lives in an orange jumpsuit if they don’t comply).

What fear do your customers have if they don’t act NOW? Is simply doing what they do now, but better, enough for them to take action? If it was, then companies all over the world would be spending all of their money on software.

For whatever solution you’re selling, think about the “what if”. What if my prospect decides to keep doing things the way they currently are at the pace they’re currently doing it? If the answer is basically “nothing”, then you could be facing slow growth, or eventual slow decline. People DO, in fact, buy things because it will make their lives better. But companies spend lots of money fixing problems that cannot be ignored.

This isn’t an easy thing to figure out – but if you can make the connection, your sales cycles will shorten, your deal sizes will rise, and you may have a company that we will all have heard of.